Saturday, January 26, 2008

Senator Ken Salazar: Bipartisan, silent, obedient

On FISA:

That's typically the way Washington works -- the most significant laws are seamlessly enacted with little real debate or attention, driven by corporations and lobbyists working in secret with Senators, cheered on by the Serious media pundits, with bipartisan pools of lawmakers silently and obediently on board. And once those forces line up behind any measure, it is normally almost impossible to stop it -- not just stop it, but even disrupt it at all. That's the insulated Beltway parlor, virtually impervious to outside influences, least of all the opinions of the citizen-rabble.

* * * * *

All of those standard Beltway forces are squarely lined up behind telecom immunity and new eavesdropping powers, and yet, things are not proceeding smoothly for them at all. Back in December, Harry Reid, Jay Rockefeller and Mitch McConnell scheduled just a couple of days for the FISA debate because they assumed that was all that would be needed to deliver quickly and quietly to the President everything he demanded.

Labels: ,

Friday, January 25, 2008

Bob Schaffer: Still no views, nor time, nor button for the issues

Labels: , , ,

More hate talk from right-wing radio host Jon Caldara

Jon Caldara said Hillary Clinton got "bitch slapped" in the Democratic presidential debate the other night. Progress Now noticed:
ProgressNowAction is calling on Jon Caldara to immediately apologize for using the term "bitch-slapped" on his recent radio show. The group also launched a statewide online petition to call for businesses to cancel their advertising on Caldara's show.

"We call on Jon Caldara to immediately apologize for spewing hate against women," stated ProgressNowAction's Outreach Director Brittney Wilburn.

Earlier this week a local right-wing host on Denver's 850 KOA radio, Jon Caldara, discussed the presidential candidate debates. During his talk, he asked his guest on-air whether it "was it fair to say" that Senator Clinton (NY) "got bitch-slapped tonight?" (The Jon Caldara Show, Newsradio 850 KOA, evening broadcast 1/21/2008)

"This language is demeaning to all women and minimizes the severity of domestic violence in our community," noted Wilburn.

According to latest statistics from the Colorado Coalition against Domestic Violence, domestic violence victim assistance agencies in Colorado answered 43,863 emergency crisis phone calls in 2006.(ccadv.org/facts.htm)

"Of course, Caldara has the right to speak his mind freely and we have the right to tell Caldara, KOA radio, its owner Clear Channel Communications, and their advertisers that we will not tolerate hate against women," stated Wilburn.

ProgressNowAction launched a statewide online campaign calling on the public to sign a petition:

http://dontpayforhate.com

ProgressNowAction, Colorado's largest progressive organization, called on its members and partner organizations to call on businesses that advertise on Caldara's radio show and ask them to pull their ads. The businesses are listed below.

This is isn't the first time Caldara has attacked women. Last year during his on-air Newsradio 850 KOA radio program, Caldara used "date rape" analogies to push his right-wing economic agenda. (Colorado Springs Gazette, May 10, 2007; Denver Post, 8/3/2007) According to the Colorado Coalition against Sexual Assault, 24% of women in Colorado have been victims of sexual assault. (ccasa.org/statistics.cfm)

# # #

The following are the Newsradio 850AM "Jon Caldara show" advertisers for January 21, 2008 program where Caldara asked whether Senator Clinton was "bitch slapped" included:

Dun-Rite Kitchens and Baths
Ask for President: Dan Cechini
(303) 722-2295
dunritekitchens@msn.com

Hines-Sight Lasik Eye Center
Ask for Owner: William Hines
(303) 777-3277
info@hines-sight.com

Innomax Sleep Mattresses
Ask for President: Mark Miller
(303) 296-9530
sleep@innomax.com

K&H Windows
Ask for President: Ted Roland
(303) 421-7100 x210
ted@khwindows.com

The Shane Co.
Ask for Owner: Tom Shane
(303) 792-3500
Tom.Shane@shaneco.com

Let them know you don't think "bitch slap" is appropriate for our political discourse.

Labels: ,

All Republican Prez candidates still think the Iraq war was a brilliant idea

Labels: ,

At least someone's doing well in this economy....

Exxon set to hit record profits.

With a flailing U.S. economy and skyrocketing oil prices, Exxon Mobil is “within striking distance of setting an all-time profit record - again.” The company is expected to earn $39.2 billion for 2007, “which breaks down to the company earning about $75,000 a minute.”

Thursday, January 24, 2008

The kick heard 'round the State: Doug Bruce censured on a 62-1 vote

Republican Doug Bruce wanted to be treated special at his first day and swearing in; well, he finally got it:
The House of Representatives voted 62-1 to censure Rep. Douglas Bruce. The House has no record of a member being censured in its history.

Bruce kicked Rocky Mountain News photographer Javier Manzano on Jan. 14 during a morning prayer.

The vote followed a statement by Bruce, R-Colorado Springs, in which he again defended his actions as being meant to preserve order. Bruce also said he did not kick Manzano but nudged him, that the House was not in order at the time of the incident and that he was a private citizen. Bruce was sworn into office later that day.
A certain Chinese proverb comes to mind......

Labels: ,

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

The kick heard 'round the State: Doug Bruce can't keep his lies straight

First there was the kick. That very day Russ Johnson had Bruce on live on KVOR wherein the kick became a "tap", according to Doug. Then the censure came and Doug held his ground.

Next Media Matters catches him on Colorado 2031 with Ron Zappollo and lies twice as he lies to the guy's face:
ZAPPOLO: You're the politician. You've got to be bigger. Don't you have to be bigger than all this?

BRUCE: I'm the "unpolitician." That's what I ran as.

The unpolitician who strives for ever higher office and ever more influence over public policy. OK, we'll let him keep that little fantasy. Next lie:
BRUCE: And at some point I'd like to get down and talk about public policy issues. That's what I was elected to do.
He was appointed by a Republican vacancy committee. And it looks like he'll hold his ground through it all - against all social norms (except those of eastern El Paso County), and against the truth.

Doug Bruce: kicker, liar, Republican. Keep up the good work, Doug!

Labels:

Iraq war lie compendium

Just what got us there, not what has kept us there:
President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nearly five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.

On at least 532 separate occasions (in speeches, briefings, interviews, testimony, and the like), Bush and these three key officials, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan, stated unequivocally that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (or was trying to produce or obtain them), links to Al Qaeda, or both. This concerted effort was the underpinning of the Bush administration's case for war.

It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to Al Qaeda.
Heckuva job, America.

Labels:

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

QOTD

The president said that “in a civilized society, the strong protect the weak.”

I'm sure he did say that.....

Labels:

Western Strategies and Jay Fawcett kicking into gear

Health Department crucial to food safety

The news story, “Inspections scarce; complaints double,” in the Jan. 18 Gazette was a general call to define what we are willing to pay the El Paso County Department of Health and Environment to provide versus the trade-off in risk to our health. Here is a clear example of a sensible mandate that is not currently being funded at a level that keeps pace with an increasing population base.

Since few Americans grow their own food, the entire food system puts us at risk as a community. We can quantify complaints, compare existing mandates, consider the community food delivery system, and decide on the appropriate number of inspectors. This straightforward exercise will determine where tax dollars go and what they do.

We rely on the county Department of Health and Environment to be responsive to problems such as pandemic outbreaks, to provide health education and to track the occurrence of communicable diseases. We have established these tasks based on the lessons learned through history and the deaths that result when they are ignored. This is not a scare tactic, but rather a reality.

In evaluating the current state of the health care infrastructure of Colorado Springs and El Paso County, the Western Strategies Center has outlined some courses of action that address this challenge as well as others. The formal presentation of this study to the community will be at noon on Wednesday in the Carnegie Room of the Penrose Library.

Jay Fawcett

President & CEO
Western Strategies Center
Jay Fawcett is proving his intelligence and citizenship by the day. Thanks, Jay!

Labels: ,

Monday, January 21, 2008

Caucusing 101

Never mind the votes. In caucus states in particular, it’s all about delegates.

Each precinct holds a caucus. Each precinct caucus sends some number of delegates to the meeting at the next level up the hierarchy – normally a county convention. The county convention acts just like a large caucus. The county convention sends delegates to one or more meetings up the food chain. In Colorado, each county convention sends delegates both to the Congressional District convention and to the state convention. These higher-level meetings, in turn, send delegates to the national convention.

The state Democratic Party allocates delegates to each precinct. In Colorado, every precinct gets at least two delegates to the county convention. A third delegate is awarded to precincts that exceeded some Democratic performance figure in either the most recent statewide race for governor or the last presidential election, whichever is the more recent of the two. Then an additional delegate is added for each five precinct caucus attendees.

The preliminaries now out of the way, let’s do some caucus arithmetic. A caveat: each state allocates delegates differently, depending on the state’s “Delegate Selection Plan,” but the principles are basically the same, since each state’s plan must conform to national Party rules. Another caveat: I’m using Colorado as the example since that’s the system with which I’m the most familiar.

Okay, so you waltz into your precinct caucus. The party has told you that your precinct doesn't merit a bonus delegate based on the 2006 governor’s election. So you start with two delegates from your precinct to the county convention. However, when the caucus opens, you see that there are 20 people in attendance, and the caucus leader (elected at the caucus as the first item of business along with the caucus secretary) notes that because of the delegate-per-five-attendees rule, your caucus will send six delegates to the county convention.

Next, the caucus holds a preference poll. In Iowa, people physically move to a designated place in the room or venue. In Colorado, the people stay put and announce their preferences.

You see that eight people support candidate A, six people support candidate B, four support candidate C, and one each support candidates D and E.

You calculate the percentages of each candidate’s support. A got 40% (8/20), B got 30%, C received 20%, and D and E came in with 5% each.

The national Party rule applies: a candidate must garner at least 15% of the caucus/convention support to be “viable.” Another term for the 15% rule is “making threshold.”

Sidenote: At least in Colorado, “Uncommitted” is considered a candidate, and "Uncommitted" must similarly get 15% of the caucus votes to stay viable.

Poor candidates D and E didn’t make it. Their supporters now select one of the viable candidates. You see that one has gone to candidate B and the other sided with candidate C. So the totals now read, candidate A remains at 8 votes, B moved up to 7 votes, and C comes in with 5. Once again, we calculate the percentages: A has 40%, B now has 35%, and C has 25%.

It’s time to allocate the six delegates. More arithmetic. Remember that the precinct will send six delegates to the county convention:

A: 40% x 6 = 2.40
B: 35% x 6 = 2.10
C: 25% x 6 = 1.50

Look only at the integer portion of the results. In this case the value is two for candidates A and B, while C's integer protion is one, so so far, A and B get two delegates each and C gets one. Then you ask, are there any delegates left over? Yes, there is one left over since the caucus merits six delegates. So now look at the decimal or fractional part of the result above. The largest decimal is candidate A’s 0.4. A gets the extra delegate, and the six delegates comprise three for A, two for B, and one for C. Had there been a seventh delegate available, B would get another delegate, and so on looking at the order of the fractional part of the value above.

Now pay attention. If the caucus only gets three delegates to the county convention and the percentages of support for A, B, and C were the same, you’d wind up with:

A: 40% x 3 = 1.20
B: 35% x 3 = 1.05
C: 25% x 3 = 0.75

Another rule comes into play. Even though the integer portion of C’s value is zero, any candidate who “makes threshold” in the first preference vote gets at least one delegate. Applying that rule, all three candidates get one delegate, and there are no delegates left over. So the caucus sends one delegate each pledged to candidates A, B, and C.

Notice what happened? The fact that A got 15 points (by percentage) more than C doesn’t matter at all!!!! The ONLY thing that matters is the number of delegates. But I submit that the media will ignore that little bit of trivia. They’ll report that A “won,” “beating” B and C, when in fact they ended up getting the same number of delegates.

Once the delegates are allocated, attendees “run” to become delegates pledged to their chosen candidates. The precinct will send six delegates allocated to candidates as above, and another six alternates allocated similarly. I should add that at the county, congressional district, and state conventions, almost all alternates get seated as full delegates on account of no-shows.

This arithmetic and process apply at every level of the system, by the way.

Eventually, Colorado will send 71 delegates to the national convention. Of those, 55 are “pledged” with 16 “unpledged.” At least on paper. The unpledged delegates are Party leaders and elected officials (PLEOs). Of course, they have a preference, and their support is usually factored in to determine what the convention looks like going in.

Of the 55 pledged delegates, 36 are chosen at the congressional districts while 12 are elected "at large" at the state convention.

After all this process and hoopla, and a year of campaigning and countless numbers of stories, polls, and predictions, and millions of dollars spent by the candidates, Iowa, for example, ends up with 57 delegates.

Now, you may ask, how many delegates will there be at the convention in Denver in August? FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTEEN. How’s that again? You got it. Iowa makes up a whopping 1.29% of the total delegate count.

Given the importance attached to the Iowa caucuses, you might conclude that the system is insane. I would have to put myself in the “it’s insane” camp.

By the way, the arithmetic in primary states is a little more straightforward. Delegates to the national convention are allocated to candidates as closely as possible to the primary results. A separate process, normally some kind of caucus or convention system, determines who the delegates will be. In California, caucuses are held for that purpose. Attendees of the caucus “run” to get elected as a delegate, but the primary replaces the preference polls conducted in pure caucus states. Other primary states would do more or less the same thing.

The bottom line: There really aren’t any “winners” and “losers” in the primary/caucus season. It’s all about the delegates. Sure, one candidate may get a few more delegates than the others, but it’s the national delegate count that really matters. The way the arithmetic works, a “win’ by a few percentage points may not make much difference in the delegate count.

Finally, all of this applies only to the Democratic Party. In some states, Republican primaries are “winner take all.” That is, a narrow win by a candidate would result in getting all the state’s delegates. The Democratic Party doesn’t find this system….well….democratic, and enforces proportional delegate allocation.

A final note. The presidential preference poll is just one item on the caucus agenda. After electing a caucus chair and secretary and selecting presidential delegates to the county convention, the caucus repeats the process for statewide and federal races. At the county, congressional, and state levels, there are two processes: for President, it's called a convention. For the other races, it's an assembly. At the higher-level meetings, the chair actually closes the convention and formally opens the assembly. Delegates to the convention and assembly normally are the same people, but not necessarily.

After selecting delegates to the convention and assembly, the caucus then votes on any proposed resolutions. Finally, the caucus elects one or two precinct committee-persons to serve for the next two years. These precinct committee-people automatically become members of the state Senate, House, and County Central Committees.

At the county assemblies, the meeting will break up into separate state House districts, then state Senate districts, and finally congressional district meetings. They nominate candidates for their respective races. It gets complicated and beyond the scope of this (already too-long) message when house, senate, or congressional districts cross county boundaries.

Clear as mud? Feel free to contact me by e-mail or phone, 303-989-3185, or contact your county party headquarters. I khow just enough to be dangerous. IMPORTANT: If you're interested in running your caucus or becoming the caucus secretary, please attend one of the state or county caucus training sessions nearby if you haven't already done so. If you learn something there that contradicts what I said in this message, they're probably right and I'm probably wrong.

HAPPY CAUCUSING!!

Labels:

Celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a Great Black Man whose words still resound

It's twelve minutes and worth another viewing:

Labels:

Sunday, January 20, 2008

As the recession looms ever larger

Until we stop operating on the premise that the world is our playground to run and control through military force -- for invasions, bombing campaigns, wars and occupations to be commenced whenever we perceive it to be in our "interests," however broadly that might be defined -- the only real question is how quickly these problems are going to worsen, how severely the accompanying erosion of our national character will become. A country that is defined by endless war and world military hegemony is inevitably, unavoidably, the Nation of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and Torture and Renditions and Limitless Presidential Power and Secret Black Sites and Blackwater.
Stare at that Iraq war cost calculator at the right for a few minutes as our economy continues to worsen.......

Labels: ,