The Peter Principle Lives
The Peter Principle thrives in the Bush Administration. For those too young to remember, it's this: the process of climbing up the hierarchical corporate ladder indefinitely until the employee reaches a position where he or she is no longer competent.
George Bush is the most highly visible example of this principle in action (couldn't he have just been happy as the relatively harmless Governor in Texas?). And though Republicans advised the President against a recess appointment of him, and he has long since passed that point of minimal competence, John Bolton is the latest example of the truth of the Peter Principle.
He perjured himself to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he lied to congress in previous testimony, misused intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war, and has had various other run-ins with our dedicated diplomatic corps, and is a possible defendent in the CIA-Leak scandal.
Bingo! All the qualities our President values and rewards. George Bush decided he was the best man to reform the U.N. (If by "reform" you mean: degrade the last remaining good will countries of the world had for us, insult the few diplomats left at the U.N. that we haven't insulted, and further distance ourselves in a world that is increasingly dangerous and where the more countries on our side, the less on the other side! Yes, that kind of reform.)

To sum this farce up, just look closely at the expressions on each of the three parties in this picture of Bolton's recess appointment. It'll tell you all you need to know about our future representative at the United Nations, and should give ample warning to the world what George Bush has foisted on its citizens.
God help us.


2 Comments:
Here is something spooky to chew on. This is from Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution:
2. He [the president] shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.
So you see, Supreme Court judges are lumped in there with ambassadors. If Bush wanted (and was willing to alienate the entire senate), he could also make his Supreme Court nomination a reality also.
I don't know whether to consider it foolish, naive, or duplicitous to label BushCo criminality as "incompetence", but I'm not buying into that nonsense.
The promotion pattern and failure to discipline those who've screwed the Constitution so royally reveals an organized crime ring, fueld by "honor among thieves" more than 'incompetence'.
Bush Implicates Bush (and Dems pretend it never happened [twice!])
Post a Comment
<< Home